Joris De Loore vs Mariano Tammaro Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. De Loore vs M. Tammaro

BEL
0
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
0
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Loore 0 - 0 Tammaro
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Loore | 0 |
| Tammaro | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
J. D. Loore vs M. Tammaro H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $234,635 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 63.92% (434-245) | Career Total W/L | 57.93% (84-61) |
| 13 | Titles | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. D. Loore vs M. Tammaro Match Preview:
Analysis of Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, Loore's prowess on their second serve has been exceptional, winning an impressive 54.96% of points. On the other hand, Tammaro has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 45.13%. It is noteworthy that there exists a significant correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Insights from Return Game Statistics: Delving into the return game statistics, we observe that Loore, in recent times, has triumphed in 52.57% of their opponent's second serve points. Conversely, Tammaro has exhibited a higher proficiency, boasting a 55.42% success rate in the same regard. When considering first serve returns, the numbers stand at 30.42% and 34.53% for Loore and Tammaro, respectively. Once again, these figures play a fundamental role in determining the favored player in their impending head-to-head encounter.
Under Pressure Evaluation: When it comes to saving breakpoints, Loore has demonstrated an admirable ability to prevail, saving an impressive 86.36% of such instances in recent matches. Tammaro, while still commendable, falls slightly behind with a 55.83% success rate. Bearing this in mind, this statistic holds considerable value for in-game betting predictions.
Comprehensive Performance Overview: Taking into account the overall performances in the past year, Loore has emerged victorious in 57.14% of matches played, resulting in a win/loss ratio of 20/15. Comparatively, Tammaro has achieved a marginally higher success rate, winning 60% of matches with a record of 39/26. These cumulative statistics provide an insightful basis for predicting the outcome of their upcoming encounter.
Surface Preference: Analyzing the players' performance on different surfaces, it is worth noting that Loore has excelled on hard courts, attaining a remarkable 68% success rate (117/55). However, their performance on grass courts has been comparatively weaker, with a 50% win ratio (7/7). On the other hand, Tammaro has showcased exceptional skills on hard courts, boasting a 66% win rate (23/12). Conversely, their performance on indoor hard courts has yielded a 50% win ratio (1/1).
Players' Level of Competitions: Examining the level of competitions in which they have participated, Loore has primarily competed in challenger and ITF tournaments with a prize pool exceeding $10K. Within this domain, they have achieved a commendable 50% win rate (12/12). In contrast, Tammaro has predominantly played in futures, satellites, and ITF tournaments with a prize pool of $10K, demonstrating an impressive win ratio of 62.3% (38/23). Consideration of these statistics is vital to gauge the relative preferences and performances of the players in predicting the favored contender.
Opponent Quality Assessment: Over the course of the past 12 months, Loore has encountered opponents with an average ranking of 253.37, further highlighting the caliber of competition they have faced. Conversely, Tammaro has confronted foes with an average ranking of 386.02. These opponent quality statistics shed light on the level of difficulty each player has experienced.
Deciding Set Performance versus All Players: In the event that this match intensifies and extends to a deciding set, Loore has showcased their ability to triumph in 54% of such situations over the past year. On the other hand, Tammaro has demonstrated an even higher proficiency with an outstanding 75% success rate throughout their tour matches. These figures carry particular significance for those interested in live predictions and betting opportunities.
Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While past player performance undeniably informs predictions, it is equally important to consider the current event statistics to assess a player's form. It is advisable to refer to the section below (if available) to gain insights into their performance within the ongoing event. Additionally, certain players may exhibit superior performances in specific events, warranting consideration in predicting the final outcome.
Break Point Conversion: Analyzing recent form, Loore has demonstrated a proficient break point conversion rate of 53.13% when presented with such opportunities. Tammaro, although slightly lower, remains formidable with a conversion rate of 47.26% when attempting to break their opponent's serve. These statistics play a pivotal role in providing in-game live betting tips whenever a player faces a break point opportunity.
If you are intrigued by the analysis and prediction models for tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. (Warning: Only for those enthralled by statistical intricacies).
Joris De Loore vs Mariano Tammaro Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
J. D. Loore Recent Matches Played
M. Tammaro Recent Matches Played

J. D. Loore vs M. Tammaro Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.92% (434/245) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.93% (84/61) |
| 61.91% (977/601) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.69% (186/148) |
| 54.58% (8262/6875) | Games Win/Loss | 52.92% (1666/1482) |
| 67.96% (123/58) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.86% (24/13) |
| 63.34% (197/114) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.19% (59/46) |
| 61.85% (107/66) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 50.00% (7/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.41 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 3048 | Aces Total | 163 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1070 | Total Double Faults | 261 |
| 1:7:55 | Average Match Time | 1:20:4 |
| 542.91 | Average Opponent Rank | 113.28 |
| 63% (18926/30161) | 1st Serve % | 64% (4735/7411) |
| 75% (14216/18926) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (3070/4735) |
| 52% (5859/11235) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1275/2676) |
| 43% (1247/2918) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (369/807) |
| 39% (12054/31218) | Return Points Win % | 41% (3091/7452) |
| 50.00% (12/12) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59.50% (166/113) | Challenger W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 69.04% (252/113) | Futures W/L | 59.71% (83/56) |
| 64% (425/664) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (84/144) |
| 43% (3/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (128/258) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 35% (9/26) |
| 49% (108/220) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (26/43) |
| 87% (438/381) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (78/69) |
| 13% (438/56) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (78/9) |
| 21% (241/51) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (67/15) |